Monthly Archives: July 2012

Making sense of the theater massacre

July 22nd, 2012|

(‘76 Contributor) I’ve been asked to comment on the theater massacre. I think there is just one cause; a crazy shooter with God only knows what, going through his brain. Unfortunately discussions will go far and wide from this obvious fact and range from gun control to societal issues. So here are my thoughts.

I think societal issues led up to this massacre. […]

Who says we’re free?

July 21st, 2012|

(Denver Post, July 22) July 4 has seldom been set up more dramatically for Americans to think hard about freedom, than it was with this year’s Supreme Court ruling on health care the week before. If Congress can compel the behavior of individuals through taxation, what’s really left of our liberty?

When you read the decision by Chief Justice John Roberts alongside the Declaration of Independence, […]

Obama on business: Ignorance or arrogance?

July 21st, 2012|

(Centennial Fellow) What’s more frustrating about President Obama – his ignorance of how difficult it is to make a profit in business or his arrogance that there’s so little he doesn’t know?

Here’s a man with less business experience than a third-grader with a lemonade stand and who has said […]

Liberals’ top ten reasons to dislike Mitt Romney

July 19th, 2012|

(From where else, the Internet)
With a gracious, statesmanlike aura, he looks like every central casting’s #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief. Too good looking for the job especially since …
He’s been married to ONE woman his entire life. And he has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS. What’s a good solid, muck raking journalist got to write about here? […]

Exceptional or Entitled: Which America?

July 14th, 2012|

(Salem, Massachusetts) Weather allowing, Salem is a fairly short and pleasant sailing trip from Boston to the Bay State’s rocky North Shore. If a visitor has history on his mind, there is virtue in perusing Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The House of the Seven Gables or Jonathan Edwards fiery sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. […]

Incinerating the American West

July 9th, 2012|

(‘76 Contributor) As I write these lines, vast wildfires are sweeping through my home state of Colorado and other areas of the American west. Last week, two of my employees had to leave work early to rush home to evacuate their families from imminent danger. Hundreds of houses have already been destroyed, and thousands of acres of trees incinerated, and unknown myriads of wild animals burned alive. […]

Helping struggling folks on Colfax

July 9th, 2012|

Most have jobs but at minimum wage, or take day labor in an economy where their labor is hardly needed. Admittedly, most have made mistakes somewhere along the line: dropping out of high school, becoming a teen-aged mother, using drugs or alcohol, getting sent to jail, losing a job, etc. Others are just living the marginal lifestyle in which they were raised, never able to rise above just barely making it. […]

Who’s right on health exchanges, Bachmann or Stephens?

July 2nd, 2012|

Editor: Leading conservatives in the US House and Senate this week sounded the same warning against state health care exchanges as we heard from many Coloradans 18 months ago, during the legislative battle over SB-200.

One need not join the derisive voices deriding our state’s exchange as “Amycare” (in reference to House Majority Leader Amy Stephens, prime sponsor of the bill) to share the concern expressed by 76 congressional Republicans in the following news release and letter. […]

Obamacare ruling: A mess with a message

July 2nd, 2012|

For anyone who naively thought the Supreme Court would render a clean and tidy decision on ObamaCare, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority-of-one opinion should be instructive.

Rarely does the high court render an opinion that draws bright lines by simply applying the constitution as written. More often, the court’s opinion is sufficiently muddled that a future court in a similar case can arrive at any decision it desires simply by selectively quoting only the passages that support its desired outcome and ignoring those that do not. […]